Compare towns
Salisbury vs Danby vs Shoreham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Salisbury has grown the fastest since 2010 (+7.5%).
Danby has the most affordable homes ($272k median).
Shoreham has the most people working from home (15.9%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Salisbury | Danby | Shoreham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,200 |
1,133Lowest |
1,269Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +7.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.4% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.6±6.5Lowest 17% above VT |
52.6±4.8Highest 22% above VT |
51.8±7.2 20% above VT |
| Danby and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 16.6%±3.2 VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18%±4.7Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Shoreham and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 30.4%±2.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
26.1%±3.7 VT: 21.4% |
| Salisbury and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
34.8% VT: 43.8% |
36.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 1.6%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.7%±1.1 VT: 7% |
| Danby and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $99,688±$21kHighest 23% above VT |
$77,321±$13kLowest 5% below VT |
$93,654±$23k 15% above VT |
| Salisbury and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $306,900±$51k 3% below VT |
$272,400±$41kLowest 14% below VT |
$316,400±$34kHighest about the VT average |
| Shoreham and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,443±$984Highest 17% above VT |
$794±$166Lowest 36% below VT |
$1,306±$335 6% above VT |
| Salisbury and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,842Highest 4% below VT |
$4,543Lowest 10% below VT |
$4,713 6% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 31.9%±22.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6Highest VT: 48.4% |
33.3%±48.3 VT: 48.4% |
| Danby and Shoreham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
9.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 88.7% VT: 73.2% |
89.3%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1967Lowest 9 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1979 3 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 20% below VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
26 min 11% above VT |
| Work from home | 6%±2.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1 VT: 16.9% |
15.9%±5.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Shoreham and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.