Compare towns
Salisbury vs Lancaster vs Deep River
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Salisbury has the most expensive homes ($764k median).
Lancaster has the most homeowners (85.1%).
Deep River has the most affordable homes ($362k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Salisbury | Lancaster | Deep River |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,224Lowest |
8,606Highest |
4,458 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +4.8% U.S.: +7.4% |
— |
| Median age | 44.2±9.9 14% above U.S. |
43.1±4.9Lowest 11% above U.S. |
46.2±5.6Highest 19% above U.S. |
| Deep River and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±6.9Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.2%±4Highest U.S.: 22% |
16.6%±4.7Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Age 65+ | 28.1%±5.1Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19.9%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
22.1%±4.1 U.S.: 17.2% |
| Salisbury and Deep River are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 58.8%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
50.3% U.S.: 35.7% |
44.6%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±2.1Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
3%±1.8 U.S.: 6.4% |
3.8%±2.2Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Deep River and Lancaster are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $124,256±$26k 54% above U.S. |
$134,833±$27kHighest 67% above U.S. |
$90,253±$19kLowest 12% above U.S. |
| Lancaster and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $763,700±$121kHighest 130% above U.S. |
$519,100±$60k 56% above U.S. |
$362,200±$26kLowest 9% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,846±$736 31% above U.S. |
$2,338±$539Highest 65% above U.S. |
$1,221±$185Lowest 14% below U.S. |
| Lancaster and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,125Lowest 64% above U.S. |
$7,235Highest 132% above U.S. |
$6,092 95% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 23.2%±11.8Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
68.3%±36.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
58.2%±22.9 U.S.: 51.1% |
| Lancaster and Deep River are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
1.4%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
8.2%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 68.2%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
85.1%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
69.2% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1967Lowest 13 yrs older than U.S. |
1971 9 yrs older than U.S. |
1974Highest 6 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 25% below U.S. |
32 minHighest 20% above U.S. |
24 min 8% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 28%±8 U.S.: 15.1% |
33.6%±9.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
15.2%±5.6Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
| Lancaster and Salisbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #19 of 149 in CT | #145 of 282 in MA | #70 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Salisbury School District | Nashoba | Deep River School District · Regional School District 04 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Valley Regional High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.3 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.