Compare towns
Royalton vs Sharon vs Worcester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Royalton has the highest household income ($104k).
Sharon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.9%).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Royalton | Sharon | Worcester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,752Highest |
1,577 |
831Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.8% VT: +2.8% |
+3.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 43.9±10.1Lowest about the VT average |
45.6±7.7 6% above VT |
47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
| Worcester and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.4%±5.8 VT: 17.9% |
21%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Sharon and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.1%±6.4 VT: 21.4% |
25.1%±3.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Sharon and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.6% VT: 43.8% |
37.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 8%±4.2Highest VT: 7% |
1.5%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7 VT: 7% |
| Royalton and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $103,938±$24kHighest 28% above VT |
$84,375±$17k 4% above VT |
$73,833±$18kLowest 9% below VT |
| Royalton and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $263,200±$73kLowest 17% below VT |
$346,700±$37kHighest 10% above VT |
$271,100±$27k 14% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,040±$391 16% below VT |
$1,386±$155Highest 12% above VT |
$1,023±$136Lowest 17% below VT |
| Sharon and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,675 7% below VT |
$5,903Highest 17% above VT |
$4,421Lowest 12% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 36.7%±16.1Highest VT: 48.4% |
19.8%±17.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37 VT: 48.4% |
| Royalton and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13%Highest VT: 10.1% |
3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
5.9% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 63.5%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.7% VT: 73.2% |
85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1965Lowest 11 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1976 same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 13% below VT |
26 min 12% above VT |
29 minHighest 22% above VT |
| Work from home | 17.8%±7.3 VT: 16.9% |
12.7%±3.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Worcester and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #48 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | White River Unified School District #79 | Sharon School District | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 |
| High school in town | White River Valley High School | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.