Compare towns
Royalton vs Jericho vs Rockingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Royalton has the youngest population (median age 43.9).
Jericho has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.9%).
Rockingham has the most affordable homes ($211k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Royalton | Jericho | Rockingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,752Lowest |
5,114Highest |
4,807 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.8% VT: +2.8% |
+1.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-8.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 43.9±10.1Lowest about the VT average |
49.7±5.1Highest 15% above VT |
46.4±2.6 8% above VT |
| Jericho and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 14.4%±5.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.2%±4.3 VT: 17.9% |
| Jericho and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.1%±6.4 VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.8%±5Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Rockingham and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.6% VT: 43.8% |
65.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
37.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 8%±4.2Highest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
6.1%±2.9 VT: 7% |
| Royalton and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $103,938±$24k 28% above VT |
$116,923±$16kHighest 44% above VT |
$70,857±$16kLowest 13% below VT |
| Jericho and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $263,200±$73k 17% below VT |
$493,100±$38kHighest 56% above VT |
$210,900±$14kLowest 33% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,040±$391Lowest 16% below VT |
$1,731±$111Highest 40% above VT |
$1,062±$101 14% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,675Lowest 7% below VT |
$7,318Highest 45% above VT |
$4,887 3% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 36.7%±16.1Lowest VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
46.7%±13.7 VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 13% VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
16.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 63.5% VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
61.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1965 11 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 min 13% below VT |
26 minHighest 10% above VT |
20 minLowest 16% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.8%±7.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
17.9%±7.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Jericho and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #48 of 70 in VT | #6 of 70 in VT | #65 of 70 in VT |
| School district | White River Unified School District #79 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Rockingham School District |
| High school in town | White River Valley High School | Mt. Mansfield Union High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7Lowest |
13.0Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.