Compare towns
Roxbury vs Cavendish vs Kirby
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Roxbury has the most affordable homes ($243k median).
Cavendish has the shortest commute (19 min average).
Kirby has the most people working from home (20.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Roxbury | Cavendish | Kirby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 942 |
1,242Highest |
756Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -1.9%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
— |
| Median age | 35.6±11.7Lowest 17% below VT |
45.2±5.9Highest 5% above VT |
38.8±7.1 10% below VT |
| Cavendish and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 30.6%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
18.3%±4.8Lowest VT: 17.9% |
30%±5.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Roxbury and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.7%±8.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
23.6%±2Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.2%±5.1 VT: 21.4% |
| Cavendish and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 29.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
39.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.4% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±2.3Lowest VT: 7% |
4.3%±1.9 VT: 7% |
4.6%±3.1Highest VT: 7% |
| Kirby and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $73,214±$22k 10% below VT |
$89,063±$29kHighest 10% above VT |
$54,792±$21kLowest 33% below VT |
| Cavendish and Roxbury are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $242,600±$55kLowest 23% below VT |
$285,100±$40k 10% below VT |
$302,900±$63kHighest 4% below VT |
| Kirby and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $950±$495Lowest 23% below VT |
$1,000±$546 19% below VT |
$1,250±$326Highest about the VT average |
| Kirby and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,284 15% below VT |
$3,948Lowest 22% below VT |
$4,597Highest 9% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 16.7%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
28.9%±27Highest VT: 48.4% |
25%±100 VT: 48.4% |
| Cavendish and Kirby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 27.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
6.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
21.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 94%Highest VT: 73.2% |
81.3%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
93.5% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1968Lowest 8 yrs older than VT |
1985Highest 9 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 26 min 12% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
34 minHighest 43% above VT |
| Work from home | 5.2%±3.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
18.5%±6.6 VT: 16.9% |
20.6%±9.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Kirby and Cavendish are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 | — |
| High school in town | — | None in town | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | 18 photos → | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.