Compare towns

Rowe vs Enosburgh vs Hancock vs Peru

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Rowe has the most kids (23% under 18).
Enosburgh has the most affordable homes ($223k median).
Hancock has the most expensive homes ($376k median).
Peru has the most homeowners (98.2%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRoweEnosburghHancockPeru
People
Population
453Lowest
2,804Highest
752
630
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census — —
+5.6%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
-3.9%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
48.9±6.4
26% above U.S.
40.6±3.9Lowest
4% above U.S.
47.1±11.1
21% above U.S.
52.6±4.8Highest
35% above U.S.
Peru and Rowe are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
23%±5Highest
U.S.: 22%
21%±4.2
U.S.: 22%
19.1%±4.9
U.S.: 22%
16.3%±3.5Lowest
U.S.: 22%
Rowe and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
30.2%±8.1Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
17.9%±3.3Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
27.3%±5.3
U.S.: 17.2%
29.7%±6.9
U.S.: 17.2%
Rowe and Peru are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
26.2%
U.S.: 35.7%
20.1%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
35.7%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
28%
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3.3%±2
U.S.: 6.4%
5.4%±2.4Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
3.5%±3.5
U.S.: 6.4%
3.2%±2Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Enosburgh and Hancock are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$69,583±$13k
14% below U.S.
$63,828±$17kLowest
21% below U.S.
$96,250±$26kHighest
19% above U.S.
$90,750±$18k
12% above U.S.
Hancock and Peru are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$275,000±$41k
17% below U.S.
$223,100±$39kLowest
33% below U.S.
$375,500±$21kHighest
13% above U.S.
$267,400±$15k
20% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,313±$576Highest
7% below U.S.
$852±$87Lowest
40% below U.S.
$1,268±$415
10% below U.S.
—
Rowe and Hancock are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$1,458
53% below U.S.
$3,624
16% above U.S.
$1,018Lowest
67% below U.S.
$3,805Highest
22% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
11.8%±100
U.S.: 51.1%
48.9%±11.2
U.S.: 51.1%
51.1%±36.3Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
0%±100Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
Hancock and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
15.8%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
13.9%
U.S.: 12.5%
10.6%
U.S.: 12.5%
3.2%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
90.8%
U.S.: 65.2%
75.7%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
82.8%
U.S.: 65.2%
98.2%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1959Lowest
21 yrs older than U.S.
1972
8 yrs older than U.S.
1989Highest
9 yrs newer than U.S.
1983
3 yrs newer than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
36 minHighest
35% above U.S.
32 min
21% above U.S.
22 minLowest
17% below U.S.
31 min
18% above U.S.
Work from home
7.2%±3.8Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
10.1%±4.4
U.S.: 15.1%
10.4%±4.3Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
10.3%±4.8
U.S.: 15.1%
Hancock and Peru are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #26 of 70 in VT — —
School district Rowe Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 Hancock —
High school in town None in town Enosburg Falls Middle/High School None in town —
Students per teacherat that high school —
10.4
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.