Compare towns
Rockingham vs White River Junction vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Rockingham has the most homeowners (61.7%).
White River Junction has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.8%).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Rockingham | White River Junction | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,807Highest |
3,364 |
2,060Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+10.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+3.5% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 46.4±2.6Highest 8% above VT |
33.7±3.2Lowest 22% below VT |
44.6±12.3 3% above VT |
| Rockingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4.3 VT: 17.9% |
17.1%±5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±8.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 29.8%±5Highest VT: 21.4% |
12.5%±3.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±8 VT: 21.4% |
| Rockingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
38.9% VT: 43.8% |
40%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.1%±2.9Highest VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.4Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,857±$16k 13% below VT |
$77,168±$4kHighest 5% below VT |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below VT |
| White River Junction and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $210,900±$14k 33% below VT |
$278,800±$78kHighest 12% below VT |
$170,300±$22kLowest 46% below VT |
| White River Junction and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,062±$101 14% below VT |
$1,222±$216Highest about the VT average |
$1,002±$107Lowest 19% below VT |
| White River Junction and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,887 3% below VT |
$5,651Highest 12% above VT |
$4,878Lowest 3% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 46.7%±13.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
42.9%±17.3 VT: 48.4% |
31.4%±20Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Rockingham and White River Junction are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
12.1% VT: 10.1% |
7.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 61.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
43.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
51.6% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1963Highest 13 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 min 16% below VT |
15 minLowest 35% below VT |
22 minHighest 6% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.9%±7.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
15.7%±5.8 VT: 16.9% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Rockingham and White River Junction are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #65 of 70 in VT | — | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Rockingham School District | — | — |
| High school in town | None in town | — | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.