Compare towns
Rockingham vs Randolph vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Rockingham has the most people working from home (17.9%).
Randolph has the most expensive homes ($279k median).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Rockingham | Randolph | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,807 |
4,843Highest |
2,060Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+3.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 46.4±2.6Highest 8% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
44.6±12.3 3% above VT |
| Rockingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4.3 VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±8.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 29.8%±5Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±8 VT: 21.4% |
| Rockingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
40% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.1%±2.9 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.4Lowest VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,857±$16k 13% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below VT |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $210,900±$14k 33% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$170,300±$22kLowest 46% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,062±$101 14% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$1,002±$107Lowest 19% below VT |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,887Highest 3% below VT |
$4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$4,878 3% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 46.7%±13.7 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.4%±20Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.8% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 61.7% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
51.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 16% below VT |
21 min 12% below VT |
22 minHighest 6% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.9%±7.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Rockingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #65 of 70 in VT | #55 of 70 in VT | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Rockingham School District | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.