Compare towns
Rockingham vs Randolph vs Barton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Rockingham has the oldest population (median age 46.4).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Barton has the most affordable homes ($147k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Rockingham | Randolph | Barton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,807 |
4,843Highest |
730Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-6.4% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 46.4±2.6Highest 8% above VT |
40.4±7.4 6% below VT |
40±5.5Lowest 7% below VT |
| Rockingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.2%±4.3 VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.1%±5.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Barton and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 29.8%±5Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
21.2%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Rockingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37.1% VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
21.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.1%±2.9 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.9%±1.6Lowest VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $70,857±$16k 13% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$40,833±$8kLowest 50% below VT |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $210,900±$14k 33% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$146,900±$30kLowest 54% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,062±$101 14% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$761±$150Lowest 38% below VT |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,887Highest 3% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$3,185Lowest 37% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 46.7%±13.7Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
58.8%±18.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Barton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.7% VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
25.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 61.7% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
52.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
1945 31 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 20 minLowest 16% below VT |
21 min 12% below VT |
31 minHighest 32% above VT |
| Work from home | 17.9%±7.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
16.5%±10.4 VT: 16.9% |
| Rockingham and Barton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #65 of 70 in VT | #55 of 70 in VT | #38 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Rockingham School District | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.