Compare towns
Richford vs Worcester vs Fair Haven
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Richford has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.6%).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
Fair Haven has the most affordable homes ($177k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Richford | Worcester | Fair Haven |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,467 |
831Lowest |
2,724Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-3.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+0.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 39±3.6Lowest 10% below VT |
47±2.7Highest 9% above VT |
39.2±7.6 9% below VT |
| Worcester and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4Highest VT: 17.9% |
12.8%±3.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.4%±5.1 VT: 17.9% |
| Richford and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.4%±4.4Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
18.4%±4.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Richford and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
53%Highest VT: 43.8% |
23.7% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.4%±3.6 VT: 7% |
6.9%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
4.1%±2.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Worcester and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $56,853±$13kLowest 30% below VT |
$73,833±$18kHighest 9% below VT |
$62,404±$16k 23% below VT |
| Worcester and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $176,600±$16k 44% below VT |
$271,100±$27kHighest 14% below VT |
$176,500±$14kLowest 44% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,160±$66Highest 6% below VT |
$1,023±$136 17% below VT |
$830±$116Lowest 33% below VT |
| Richford and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,300Lowest 35% below VT |
$4,421Highest 12% below VT |
$3,865 23% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 55.1%±15.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
25.5%±37Lowest VT: 48.4% |
50.9%±20.9 VT: 48.4% |
| Richford and Fair Haven are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 19.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
18.9% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.6% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1976Highest same as VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 18% above VT |
29 min 22% above VT |
31 minHighest 31% above VT |
| Work from home | 9.8%±3.9 VT: 16.9% |
23.6%±4.8Highest VT: 16.9% |
4.3%±2.5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #66 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 | Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 |
| High school in town | Richford Junior/Senior High School | None in town | Fair Haven Union Middle and High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.1Lowest |
— | 12.8Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | 12 photos → |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.