Compare towns

Richford vs Warner vs Enosburgh

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Richford has the most affordable homes ($177k median).
Warner has the most people working from home (16.6%).
Enosburgh has the most homeowners (75.7%).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRichfordWarnerEnosburgh
People
Population
2,467Lowest
2,959Highest
2,804
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+1.6%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
+3.7%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
—
Median age
39±3.6Lowest
about the U.S. average
43.7±4Highest
12% above U.S.
40.6±3.9
4% above U.S.
Warner and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21.8%±4Highest
U.S.: 22%
17.3%±3.3Lowest
U.S.: 22%
21%±4.2
U.S.: 22%
Richford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.4%±4.4Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
20.4%±3.5
U.S.: 17.2%
17.9%±3.3Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
Richford and Warner are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
20.8%
U.S.: 35.7%
42.4%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
20.1%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
6.4%±3.6Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
5.3%±1.6Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
5.4%±2.4
U.S.: 6.4%
Richford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$56,853±$13kLowest
30% below U.S.
$94,022±$18kHighest
16% above U.S.
$63,828±$17k
21% below U.S.
Warner and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$176,600±$16kLowest
47% below U.S.
$353,100±$22kHighest
6% above U.S.
$223,100±$39k
33% below U.S.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,160±$66
18% below U.S.
$1,219±$123Highest
14% below U.S.
$852±$87Lowest
40% below U.S.
Warner and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,300Lowest
6% above U.S.
$7,650Highest
145% above U.S.
$3,624
16% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
55.1%±15.9Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
48.7%±21.3Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
48.9%±11.2
U.S.: 51.1%
Richford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
19.5%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.4%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
13.9%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
70.4%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
74.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
75.7%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1938Lowest
42 yrs older than U.S.
1975Highest
5 yrs older than U.S.
1972
8 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
28 minLowest
5% above U.S.
32 min
20% above U.S.
32 minHighest
21% above U.S.
Work from home
9.8%±3.9Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
16.6%±4.8Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
10.1%±4.4
U.S.: 15.1%
Warner and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — #26 of 70 in VT
School district Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 Kearsarge Regional School District Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88
High school in town Richford Junior/Senior High School None in town Enosburg Falls Middle/High School
Students per teacherat that high school
9.1Lowest
—
10.4Highest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.