Compare towns
Richford vs Proctor vs Enosburgh vs Swanton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Richford has the most affordable homes ($177k median).
Proctor has the most homeowners (86.7%).
Enosburgh has the most people working from home (10.1%).
Swanton has the most kids (24.3% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Richford | Proctor | Enosburgh | Swanton |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 2,467 |
1,794Lowest |
2,804Highest |
2,670 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+1.3% VT: +2.8% |
— | -2.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 39±3.6 10% below VT |
42.4±6.4Highest about the VT average |
40.6±3.9 6% below VT |
37.8±4.7Lowest 12% below VT |
| Proctor and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4 VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24.3%±8.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Swanton and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 23.4%±4.4Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
19.3%±2.7 VT: 21.4% |
| Richford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 20.8% VT: 43.8% |
28.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
20.2% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 6.4%±3.6Highest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4 VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.7Lowest VT: 7% |
| Richford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $56,853±$13kLowest 30% below VT |
$74,167±$12kHighest 9% below VT |
$63,828±$17k 21% below VT |
$66,607±$27k 18% below VT |
| Proctor and Swanton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $176,600±$16kLowest 44% below VT |
$209,900±$17k 34% below VT |
$223,100±$39k 30% below VT |
$229,000±$15kHighest 28% below VT |
| Swanton and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,160±$66 6% below VT |
$1,029±$202 17% below VT |
$852±$87Lowest 31% below VT |
$1,238±$103Highest about the VT average |
| Swanton and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,300Lowest 35% below VT |
$4,032 20% below VT |
$3,624 28% below VT |
$4,370Highest 13% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 55.1%±15.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2 VT: 48.4% |
36.1%±21.6Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Richford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 19.5% VT: 10.1% |
16.2% VT: 10.1% |
13.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
20.1%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 70.4% VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
75.7% VT: 73.2% |
64.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1972Highest 4 yrs older than VT |
1952 24 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 18% above VT |
22 min 6% below VT |
32 minHighest 36% above VT |
21 minLowest 9% below VT |
| Work from home | 9.8%±3.9 VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6 VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
7.4%±4.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Enosburgh and Richford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #26 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | — |
| High school in town | Richford Junior/Senior High School | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.1 |
8.7Lowest |
10.4Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.