Compare towns
Readsboro vs Whitingham vs Windsor
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Readsboro has the oldest population (median age 50.7).
Whitingham has the highest household income ($71k).
Windsor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+0.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Readsboro | Whitingham | Windsor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 807Lowest |
1,368 |
3,554Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-1% VT: +2.8% |
+0.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.7±3.9Highest 18% above VT |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
44.8±6.5Lowest 4% above VT |
| Readsboro and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 6.9%±2.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.6%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
29.7%±6.9 VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
39.7%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±1.8Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
0.7%±0.8Lowest VT: 7% |
| Readsboro and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $55,268±$12k 32% below VT |
$70,625±$11kHighest 13% below VT |
$52,484±$11kLowest 35% below VT |
| Whitingham and Readsboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $215,500±$52k 32% below VT |
$262,300±$30kHighest 17% below VT |
$207,500±$31kLowest 34% below VT |
| Whitingham and Readsboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $724±$32 41% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,026±$89Highest 17% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,480Lowest 31% below VT |
$5,055 about the VT average |
$5,209Highest 3% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 17.4%±24.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.5%±17 VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.8% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.4% VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
57.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1945Lowest 31 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 35% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
23 minLowest 3% below VT |
| Work from home | 7.8%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
10.3%±5Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Windsor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #61 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Readsboro School District | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — |
| High school in town | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.8 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.