Compare towns
Readsboro vs Randolph vs Whitingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Readsboro has the most affordable homes ($216k median).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Whitingham has the most kids (19.8% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Readsboro | Randolph | Whitingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 807Lowest |
4,843Highest |
1,368 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.7±3.9Highest 18% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
| Readsboro and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 6.9%±2.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.6%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±1.8 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $55,268±$12kLowest 32% below VT |
$76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$70,625±$11k 13% below VT |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $215,500±$52kLowest 32% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$262,300±$30k 17% below VT |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $724±$32 41% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,480Lowest 31% below VT |
$4,698 7% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 17.4%±24.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.4% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 min 35% above VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
| Work from home | 7.8%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Readsboro School District | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 |
| High school in town | None in town | Randolph Union High School | Twin Valley Middle High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4Highest |
7.8Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.