Compare towns
Readsboro vs Proctor vs Benson
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Readsboro has the most renters (23.6% rent).
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
Benson has the most people working from home (18.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Readsboro | Proctor | Benson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 807 |
1,794Highest |
784Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-7.8% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.7±3.9 18% above VT |
42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
51.9±9.4Highest 20% above VT |
| Benson and Readsboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 6.9%±2.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
16.5%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Benson are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.6%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.4%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
26.9%±4.2Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 26.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
28.1% VT: 43.8% |
32.6%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±1.8Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
7%±5.8Highest VT: 7% |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $55,268±$12kLowest 32% below VT |
$74,167±$12k 9% below VT |
$78,625±$8kHighest 3% below VT |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $215,500±$52k 32% below VT |
$209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$242,000±$26kHighest 24% below VT |
| Benson and Readsboro are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $724±$32Lowest 41% below VT |
$1,029±$202 17% below VT |
$1,113±$170Highest 10% below VT |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,480Lowest 31% below VT |
$4,032 20% below VT |
$4,125Highest 18% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 17.4%±24.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
53.4%±35.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.3% VT: 10.1% |
16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
5.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1975Highest 1 yr older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 32 minHighest 35% above VT |
22 minLowest 6% below VT |
32 minHighest 35% above VT |
| Work from home | 7.8%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.6 VT: 16.9% |
18.6%±5.4Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Benson and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Readsboro School District | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62 |
| High school in town | None in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.7 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.