Compare towns
Reading vs Whitingham vs Jericho
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Reading has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.2%).
Whitingham has the most affordable homes ($262k median).
Jericho has the highest household income ($117k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Reading | Whitingham | Jericho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 699Lowest |
1,368 |
5,114Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+1.9% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 51.1±7.6Highest 19% above VT |
46.4±7.1Lowest 8% above VT |
49.7±5.1 15% above VT |
| Reading and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 18.5%±4.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.5%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 28.2%±3.3 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
20.2%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 46% VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
65.3%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.1%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
2.4%±1.6 VT: 7% |
| Reading and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $85,000±$19k 5% above VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$116,923±$16kHighest 44% above VT |
| Jericho and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $377,200±$72k 19% above VT |
$262,300±$30kLowest 17% below VT |
$493,100±$38kHighest 56% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,100±$331 11% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,731±$111Highest 40% above VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,754 14% above VT |
$5,055Lowest about the VT average |
$7,318Highest 45% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 63.3%±31.7 VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
79.3%±52.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Jericho and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.4% VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
0.9%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 84.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2% VT: 73.2% |
92.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1969Lowest 7 yrs older than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 33 min 41% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
26 minLowest 10% above VT |
| Work from home | 22.9%±10.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
21.8%±6.4 VT: 16.9% |
| Reading and Jericho are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #6 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 |
| High school in town | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School | Mt. Mansfield Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.8Lowest |
13.0Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.


