Compare towns
Reading vs Hooksett vs North Reading
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Reading has the most people working from home (30.2%).
Hooksett has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.6%).
North Reading has the most homeowners (84.3%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Reading | Hooksett | North Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 25,612Highest |
15,057Lowest |
15,765 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
+10.6%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+4.4% U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.7±2.3Highest 12% above U.S. |
41.3±1.5Lowest 6% above U.S. |
43±2.8 11% above U.S. |
| Reading and North Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 22.8%±2.2Highest U.S.: 22% |
17.4%±2.9Lowest U.S.: 22% |
22.3%±2.4 U.S.: 22% |
| Reading and North Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 20.7%±2.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
17.3%±2.4 U.S.: 17.2% |
16.7%±2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Reading and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 66.3%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
39.6%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
56.4% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±0.7Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
8.9%±1.6Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.2%±1.2 U.S.: 6.4% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $165,912±$13kHighest 106% above U.S. |
$117,962±$11kLowest 46% above U.S. |
$147,768±$25k 83% above U.S. |
| Reading and North Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $809,000±$22kHighest 143% above U.S. |
$407,000±$26kLowest 22% above U.S. |
$710,500±$24k 114% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,991±$273 41% above U.S. |
$1,661±$206Lowest 18% above U.S. |
$2,259±$356Highest 60% above U.S. |
| North Reading and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $9,320 199% above U.S. |
$6,554Lowest 110% above U.S. |
$9,693Highest 211% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 27.8%±9.1Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
41.7%±16.4 U.S.: 51.1% |
75.5%±25.2Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
| North Reading and Hooksett are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
3.3%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
2.7%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.4% U.S.: 65.2% |
80.6%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
84.3%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1960Lowest 20 yrs older than U.S. |
1988Highest 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1975 5 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 31 min 17% above U.S. |
27 minLowest about the U.S. average |
34 minHighest 27% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 30.2%±4.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.4%±3.1Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
26.1%±4.6 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Reading and North Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 282 in MA | #30 of 120 in NH | #33 of 282 in MA |
| School district | Reading | Hooksett School District | North Reading |
| High school in town | Reading Memorial High | None in town | North Reading High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.1Highest |
— | 10.1Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.