Compare towns
Reading vs Sturbridge vs Reading vs Milton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Massachusetts.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Sturbridge has the most affordable homes ($426k median).
Milton has the most expensive homes ($933k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Reading | Sturbridge | Reading | Milton |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||||
| People | ||||
| Population | 25,612 |
9,960Lowest |
25,612 |
28,587Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +3.1%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+6.5%Highest MA: +7.4% |
+3.1%Lowest MA: +7.4% |
+6% MA: +7.4% |
| Median age | 43.7±2.3 9% above MA |
47.2±2.6Highest 18% above MA |
43.7±2.3 9% above MA |
41.1±1.8Lowest about the MA average |
| Sturbridge and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Kids under 18 | 22.8%±2.2 MA: 19.4% |
20.7%±3Lowest MA: 19.4% |
22.8%±2.2 MA: 19.4% |
25.3%±2.2Highest MA: 19.4% |
| Milton and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Age 65+ | 20.7%±2.3Highest MA: 17.9% |
19.8%±3 MA: 17.9% |
20.7%±2.3Highest MA: 17.9% |
16.1%±1.8Lowest MA: 17.9% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 66.3% MA: 47.3% |
49.3%Lowest MA: 47.3% |
66.3% MA: 47.3% |
71.9%Highest MA: 47.3% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.9%±0.7Lowest MA: 7.9% |
4.6%±1.5 MA: 7.9% |
2.9%±0.7Lowest MA: 7.9% |
9.7%±1.1Highest MA: 7.9% |
| Cost of living | ||||
| Household incomemedian | $165,912±$13k 60% above MA |
$136,759±$15kLowest 32% above MA |
$165,912±$13k 60% above MA |
$188,529±$15kHighest 81% above MA |
| Milton and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $809,000±$22k 44% above MA |
$425,800±$18kLowest 24% below MA |
$809,000±$22k 44% above MA |
$933,200±$31kHighest 66% above MA |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,991±$273Highest 13% above MA |
$1,193±$398Lowest 32% below MA |
$1,991±$273Highest 13% above MA |
$1,474±$281 16% below MA |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $9,320 56% above MA |
$6,520Lowest 9% above MA |
$9,320 56% above MA |
$9,677Highest 61% above MA |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 27.8%±9.1Lowest MA: 51.8% |
42%±17.7 MA: 51.8% |
27.8%±9.1Lowest MA: 51.8% |
45.7%±20.9Highest MA: 51.8% |
| Milton and Sturbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||||
| Below poverty line | 3.2%Lowest MA: 10% |
3.7% MA: 10% |
3.2%Lowest MA: 10% |
4.7%Highest MA: 10% |
| Housing | ||||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 82.4%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
86.3%Highest MA: 62.5% |
82.4%Lowest MA: 62.5% |
85.2% MA: 62.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1960 4 yrs older than MA |
1982Highest 18 yrs newer than MA |
1960 4 yrs older than MA |
1945Lowest 19 yrs older than MA |
| Getting to work | ||||
| Average commuteone way | 31 minLowest 6% above MA |
38 minHighest 30% above MA |
31 minLowest 6% above MA |
31 min 8% above MA |
| Work from home | 30.2%±4.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
19.8%±4.8Lowest MA: 18.6% |
30.2%±4.1Highest MA: 18.6% |
29.7%±2.9 MA: 18.6% |
| Schools | ||||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 282 in MA | #89 of 282 in MA | #50 of 282 in MA | #55 of 282 in MA |
| School district | — | Sturbridge · Tantasqua | Reading | Milton |
| High school in town | — | Tantasqua Regional Sr High | Reading Memorial High | Milton High |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 7.7Lowest |
12.1 |
12.4Highest |
| On TownTapestry | ||||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet | None yet |
MA average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.