Compare towns
Randolph vs Windsor vs Hubbardton
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).
Hubbardton has the most people working from home (24%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Windsor | Hubbardton |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
2,060 |
831Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+3.5% VT: +2.8% |
+4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
44.6±12.3 3% above VT |
48±13.6Highest 11% above VT |
| Hubbardton and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±8.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.4%±6.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Windsor and Hubbardton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.2%±8 VT: 21.4% |
32.1%±10.7Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Hubbardton and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8% VT: 43.8% |
40%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
43.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.2%±1.4Lowest VT: 7% |
1.2%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$51,197±$4kLowest 37% below VT |
$102,321±$18kHighest 26% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$170,300±$22kLowest 46% below VT |
$293,800±$42kHighest 7% below VT |
| Hubbardton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$1,002±$107Lowest 19% below VT |
$1,708±$259Highest 38% above VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$4,878 3% below VT |
$5,284Highest 5% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
31.4%±20Lowest VT: 48.4% |
55.6%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Hubbardton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7% VT: 10.1% |
7.8%Highest VT: 10.1% |
4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2% VT: 73.2% |
51.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
94.6%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1973Highest 3 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 minLowest 12% below VT |
22 min 6% below VT |
33 minHighest 42% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
6.6%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
24%±17.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Hubbardton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | #61 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — | — |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | — | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.