Compare towns
Randolph vs Whitingham vs Mendon
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Whitingham has the most kids (19.8% under 18).
Mendon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+8.5%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Whitingham | Mendon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
1,368 |
1,113Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1% VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+8.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
53.4±10.5Highest 24% above VT |
| Mendon and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±5.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
29%±1.3 VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and Mendon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8% VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
49.4%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3.1%±2.1 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$100,524±$23kHighest 24% above VT |
| Mendon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$262,300±$30kLowest 17% below VT |
$357,000±$44kHighest 13% above VT |
| Mendon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,230±$651Highest about the VT average |
| Mendon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$5,055 about the VT average |
$5,342Highest 6% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3 VT: 48.4% |
88.6%±42.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Mendon and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.2% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
85.2% VT: 73.2% |
92.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 min 12% below VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
17 minLowest 28% below VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
22.5%±8.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Mendon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | Twin Valley Middle High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4Highest |
7.8Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.