Compare towns
Randolph vs Sharon vs Whitingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has the shortest commute (21 min average).
Sharon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.9%).
Whitingham has the most homeowners (85.2%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Sharon | Whitingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
1,577 |
1,368Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+3.9%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
45.6±7.7 6% above VT |
46.4±7.1Highest 8% above VT |
| Whitingham and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
| Sharon and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2Lowest VT: 21.4% |
25.1%±3.6 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
37.9% VT: 43.8% |
32.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.5%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$84,375±$17kHighest 4% above VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
| Sharon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$346,700±$37kHighest 10% above VT |
$262,300±$30kLowest 17% below VT |
| Sharon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$1,386±$155Highest 12% above VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
| Sharon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$5,903Highest 17% above VT |
$5,055 about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
19.8%±17.9Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7% VT: 10.1% |
3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.7% VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 minLowest 12% below VT |
26 min 12% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.7%±3.7 VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Randolph and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Sharon School District | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4Highest |
— | 7.8Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.