Compare towns

Randolph vs Sharon vs Strafford vs Castleton

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Sharon has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.9%).
Strafford has the highest household income ($111k).
Castleton has the most affordable homes ($225k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRandolphSharonStraffordCastleton
People
Population
4,843Highest
1,577
1,372Lowest
4,453
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
+3.9%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.4%
VT: +2.8%
-5.5%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
Median age
40.4±7.4
6% below VT
45.6±7.7
6% above VT
51.4±4.7Highest
19% above VT
38.3±4.3Lowest
11% below VT
Strafford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
17.3%±4.4Lowest
VT: 17.9%
21%±5
VT: 17.9%
23%±5.2Highest
VT: 17.9%
18.8%±6.4
VT: 17.9%
Strafford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
25.1%±3.6Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.1%±3.4
VT: 21.4%
20.7%±4.6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
Sharon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
40.8%
VT: 43.8%
37.9%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
53.3%Highest
VT: 43.8%
37.9%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
11.2%±2.5
VT: 7%
1.5%±0.9Lowest
VT: 7%
5.1%±2.6
VT: 7%
19.3%±1.8Highest
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$84,375±$17k
4% above VT
$110,833±$19kHighest
36% above VT
$73,854±$23kLowest
9% below VT
Strafford and Sharon are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$278,700±$38k
12% below VT
$346,700±$37k
10% above VT
$431,300±$40kHighest
36% above VT
$224,800±$71kLowest
29% below VT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,172±$173
5% below VT
$1,386±$155Highest
12% above VT
$1,125±$789Lowest
9% below VT
$1,137±$195
8% below VT
Sharon and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,698
7% below VT
$5,903
17% above VT
$7,149Highest
42% above VT
$3,167Lowest
37% below VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
54.1%±17.8
VT: 48.4%
19.8%±17.9Lowest
VT: 48.4%
44.6%±48
VT: 48.4%
67.7%±21.9Highest
VT: 48.4%
Castleton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
3%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
5.2%
VT: 10.1%
12.5%Highest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
79.7%
VT: 73.2%
88.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
79%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1971Lowest
5 yrs older than VT
1981Highest
5 yrs newer than VT
1980
4 yrs newer than VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
21 min
12% below VT
26 minHighest
12% above VT
23 min
about the VT average
19 minLowest
17% below VT
Work from home
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
12.7%±3.7
VT: 16.9%
16.1%±4.3Highest
VT: 16.9%
6.2%±3.9Lowest
VT: 16.9%
Strafford and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #55 of 70 in VT — — #39 of 70 in VT
School district Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Sharon School District Strafford School District Slate Valley Unified Union School District #62
High school in town Randolph Union High School None in town None in town None in town
Students per teacherat that high school
9.4
— — —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in Our Story None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.