Compare towns
Randolph vs Roxbury vs Warren
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has the most renters (32.8% rent).
Roxbury has the most kids (30.6% under 18).
Warren has grown the fastest since 2010 (+16%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Roxbury | Warren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
942Lowest |
1,585 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1% VT: +2.8% |
-1.9%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+16%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4 6% below VT |
35.6±11.7Lowest 17% below VT |
53.1±4.2Highest 23% above VT |
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
30.6%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
9.3%±3.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
18.7%±8.1Lowest VT: 21.4% |
30.1%±4.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Warren and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8% VT: 43.8% |
29.9%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
60%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.8%±2.3Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±4 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$73,214±$22kLowest 10% below VT |
$86,905±$16kHighest 7% above VT |
| Warren and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$242,600±$55kLowest 23% below VT |
$569,300±$123kHighest 80% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$950±$495Lowest 23% below VT |
$1,750±$394Highest 42% above VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698 7% below VT |
$4,284Lowest 15% below VT |
$7,284Highest 45% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
16.7%±100Lowest VT: 48.4% |
32.3%±26.6 VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Warren are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
27.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
15.7% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
94%Highest VT: 73.2% |
86.7% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 min 12% below VT |
26 minHighest 12% above VT |
19 minLowest 21% below VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
5.2%±3.8Lowest VT: 16.9% |
36.2%±5Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — | Harwood Unified Union School District #60 |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | — | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.