Compare towns
Randolph vs Richmond vs Rockingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Richmond has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.1%).
Rockingham has the most affordable homes ($211k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Richmond | Rockingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
4,159Lowest |
4,807 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1% VT: +2.8% |
+2.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-8.5%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
43.7±5.6 about the VT average |
46.4±2.6Highest 8% above VT |
| Rockingham and Richmond are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
21.5%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.2%±4.3 VT: 17.9% |
| Richmond and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
19.5%±6.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.8%±5Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Rockingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8% VT: 43.8% |
59.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
37.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
2.8%±1.7Lowest VT: 7% |
6.1%±2.9 VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$108,235±$24kHighest 33% above VT |
$70,857±$16kLowest 13% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38k 12% below VT |
$432,200±$39kHighest 37% above VT |
$210,900±$14kLowest 33% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
— | $1,062±$101Lowest 14% below VT |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$6,868Highest 36% above VT |
$4,887 3% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
28.5%±15.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
46.7%±13.7 VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7% VT: 10.1% |
4.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
16.7%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2% VT: 73.2% |
78.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
61.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1983Highest 7 yrs newer than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 min 12% below VT |
25 minHighest 6% above VT |
20 minLowest 16% below VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
22.5%±6.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
17.9%±7.1 VT: 16.9% |
| Richmond and Rockingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | #5 of 70 in VT | #65 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 | Rockingham School District |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.