Compare towns
Randolph vs Readsboro vs Whitingham
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Readsboro has the most affordable homes ($216k median).
Whitingham has the most kids (19.8% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Readsboro | Whitingham |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 4,843Highest |
807Lowest |
1,368 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
50.7±3.9Highest 18% above VT |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
| Readsboro and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
6.9%±2.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
20.6%±4.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
26.7%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
3.3%±1.8 VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $76,758±$6kHighest 5% below VT |
$55,268±$12kLowest 32% below VT |
$70,625±$11k 13% below VT |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$215,500±$52kLowest 32% below VT |
$262,300±$30k 17% below VT |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$724±$32 41% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,698 7% below VT |
$3,480Lowest 31% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.1%±17.8 VT: 48.4% |
17.4%±24.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 7.7% VT: 10.1% |
7.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
15.5%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
76.4% VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 21 minLowest 12% below VT |
32 min 35% above VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
| Work from home | 12.9%±4.7Highest VT: 16.9% |
7.8%±3.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
| Randolph and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Readsboro School District | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 |
| High school in town | Randolph Union High School | None in town | Twin Valley Middle High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 9.4Highest |
— | 7.8Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.