Compare towns

Randolph vs Warner vs Randolph vs Ludlow

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.5%).
Warner has the highest household income ($94k).
Randolph has the youngest population (median age 40.4).
Ludlow has the most renters (48.6% rent).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRandolphWarnerRandolphLudlow
People
Population
2,007
2,959
4,843Highest
808Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+5.5%Highest
U.S.: +7.4%
+3.7%
U.S.: +7.4%
-0.1%
U.S.: +7.4%
-4.7%Lowest
U.S.: +7.4%
Median age
50.5±7.7Highest
30% above U.S.
43.7±4
12% above U.S.
40.4±7.4Lowest
4% above U.S.
48.7±5.6
25% above U.S.
Randolph and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
11%±5Lowest
U.S.: 22%
17.3%±3.3Highest
U.S.: 22%
17.3%±4.4Highest
U.S.: 22%
13.1%±3.7
U.S.: 22%
Age 65+
24.2%±4.9
U.S.: 17.2%
20.4%±3.5Lowest
U.S.: 17.2%
22.9%±4.2
U.S.: 17.2%
30.4%±0.5Highest
U.S.: 17.2%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
42.1%
U.S.: 35.7%
42.4%Highest
U.S.: 35.7%
40.8%
U.S.: 35.7%
39.3%Lowest
U.S.: 35.7%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
7.3%±4.7
U.S.: 6.4%
5.3%±1.6
U.S.: 6.4%
11.2%±2.5Highest
U.S.: 6.4%
2.6%±1.6Lowest
U.S.: 6.4%
Randolph and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$75,069±$11k
7% below U.S.
$94,022±$18kHighest
16% above U.S.
$76,758±$6k
5% below U.S.
$56,667±$19kLowest
30% below U.S.
Warner and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$235,400±$25kLowest
29% below U.S.
$353,100±$22kHighest
6% above U.S.
$278,700±$38k
16% below U.S.
$304,000±$32k
9% below U.S.
Warner and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,095±$198
23% below U.S.
$1,219±$123Highest
14% below U.S.
$1,172±$173
17% below U.S.
$1,018±$91Lowest
28% below U.S.
Warner and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,507
45% above U.S.
$7,650Highest
145% above U.S.
$4,698
51% above U.S.
$4,237Lowest
36% above U.S.
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
54.3%±20.8Highest
U.S.: 51.1%
48.7%±21.3
U.S.: 51.1%
54.1%±17.8
U.S.: 51.1%
33%±13.8Lowest
U.S.: 51.1%
Randolph and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
14.1%Highest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.4%
U.S.: 12.5%
7.7%Lowest
U.S.: 12.5%
8.7%
U.S.: 12.5%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
53.6%
U.S.: 65.2%
74.6%Highest
U.S.: 65.2%
67.2%
U.S.: 65.2%
51.4%Lowest
U.S.: 65.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1942
38 yrs older than U.S.
1975Highest
5 yrs older than U.S.
1971
9 yrs older than U.S.
1938Lowest
42 yrs older than U.S.
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
18 minLowest
32% below U.S.
32 minHighest
20% above U.S.
21 min
22% below U.S.
21 min
20% below U.S.
Work from home
17.7%±7.6Highest
U.S.: 15.1%
16.6%±4.8
U.S.: 15.1%
12.9%±4.7Lowest
U.S.: 15.1%
17.3%±6.4
U.S.: 15.1%
Randolph and Ludlow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #55 of 70 in VT — #55 of 70 in VT —
School district — Kearsarge Regional School District Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 —
High school in town — None in town Randolph Union High School —
Students per teacherat that high school — —
9.4
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.