Compare towns
Randolph vs Royalton vs North Bennington
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.5%).
Royalton has the highest household income ($104k).
North Bennington has the most expensive homes ($313k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Royalton | North Bennington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,007 |
2,752Highest |
1,336Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-0.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.4% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.5±7.7Highest 17% above VT |
43.9±10.1Lowest about the VT average |
43.9±10Lowest about the VT average |
| Randolph and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 11%±5 VT: 17.9% |
14.4%±5.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
10.4%±2.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Royalton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.2%±4.9 VT: 21.4% |
22.1%±6.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.9%±8.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
| North Bennington and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.1% VT: 43.8% |
42.6%Highest VT: 43.8% |
41.4%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.3%±4.7Lowest VT: 7% |
8%±4.2 VT: 7% |
21.6%±6.5Highest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,069±$11k 8% below VT |
$103,938±$24kHighest 28% above VT |
$68,571±$10kLowest 16% below VT |
| Royalton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $235,400±$25kLowest 26% below VT |
$263,200±$73k 17% below VT |
$313,000±$40kHighest about the VT average |
| North Bennington and Royalton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,095±$198 11% below VT |
$1,040±$391Lowest 16% below VT |
$1,447±$278Highest 17% above VT |
| North Bennington and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,507Lowest 11% below VT |
$4,675 7% below VT |
$5,590Highest 11% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.3%±20.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
36.7%±16.1Lowest VT: 48.4% |
53.7%±26.9 VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and North Bennington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 14.1%Highest VT: 10.1% |
13% VT: 10.1% |
7.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 53.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
63.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
61.4% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1942Lowest 34 yrs older than VT |
1965Highest 11 yrs older than VT |
1957 19 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 18 min 24% below VT |
20 minHighest 13% below VT |
18 minLowest 24% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.7%±7.6 VT: 16.9% |
17.8%±7.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
17.3%±7.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Royalton and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | #48 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | White River Unified School District #79 | — |
| High school in town | — | White River Valley High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 8.7 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.