Compare towns

Randolph vs Ripton vs Worcester vs North Bennington

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Randolph has the most affordable homes ($235k median).
Ripton has grown the fastest since 2010 (+25.7%).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
North Bennington has the youngest population (median age 43.9).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRandolphRiptonWorcesterNorth Bennington
People
Population
2,007Highest
508Lowest
831
1,336
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+5.5%
VT: +2.8%
+25.7%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-3.4%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+4.4%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
50.5±7.7Highest
17% above VT
47.7±14.2
11% above VT
47±2.7
9% above VT
43.9±10Lowest
about the VT average
Randolph and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
11%±5
VT: 17.9%
11.8%±6.3
VT: 17.9%
12.8%±3.9Highest
VT: 17.9%
10.4%±2.9Lowest
VT: 17.9%
Worcester and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
24.2%±4.9
VT: 21.4%
30.5%±7.1
VT: 21.4%
19.5%±2.5Lowest
VT: 21.4%
31.9%±8.1Highest
VT: 21.4%
North Bennington and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
42.1%
VT: 43.8%
48%
VT: 43.8%
53%Highest
VT: 43.8%
41.4%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
7.3%±4.7
VT: 7%
20.1%±6.3
VT: 7%
6.9%±4.7Lowest
VT: 7%
21.6%±6.5Highest
VT: 7%
North Bennington and Ripton are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$75,069±$11k
8% below VT
$112,917±$15kHighest
39% above VT
$73,833±$18k
9% below VT
$68,571±$10kLowest
16% below VT
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$235,400±$25kLowest
26% below VT
$394,400±$61kHighest
25% above VT
$271,100±$27k
14% below VT
$313,000±$40k
about the VT average
Ripton and North Bennington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,095±$198
11% below VT
—
$1,023±$136Lowest
17% below VT
$1,447±$278Highest
17% above VT
North Bennington and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,507
11% below VT
$4,915
about the VT average
$4,421Lowest
12% below VT
$5,590Highest
11% above VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
54.3%±20.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
52.9%±100
VT: 48.4%
25.5%±37Lowest
VT: 48.4%
53.7%±26.9
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and North Bennington are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
14.1%Highest
VT: 10.1%
8.6%
VT: 10.1%
5.9%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
7.4%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
53.6%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
90.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
85.9%
VT: 73.2%
61.4%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1942Lowest
34 yrs older than VT
1973
3 yrs older than VT
1976Highest
same as VT
1957
19 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
18 min
24% below VT
24 min
about the VT average
29 minHighest
22% above VT
18 minLowest
24% below VT
Work from home
17.7%±7.6
VT: 16.9%
17.2%±8.7Lowest
VT: 16.9%
23.6%±4.8Highest
VT: 16.9%
17.3%±7.3
VT: 16.9%
Worcester and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #55 of 70 in VT — — —
School district — Addison Central Unified Union School District #55 Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 —
High school in town — None in town None in town —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.