Compare towns

Randolph vs Randolph vs Underhill vs Windsor

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.5%).
Underhill has the most expensive homes ($446k median).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($208k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureRandolphRandolphUnderhillWindsor
People
Population
2,007Lowest
4,843Highest
3,141
3,554
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+5.5%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+3.7%
VT: +2.8%
+0.2%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
50.5±7.7Highest
17% above VT
40.4±7.4
6% below VT
38.1±11.4Lowest
12% below VT
44.8±6.5
4% above VT
Randolph and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
11%±5Lowest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4
VT: 17.9%
27.8%±10.9Highest
VT: 17.9%
19.5%±5.2
VT: 17.9%
Underhill and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
24.2%±4.9
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
17.6%±6Lowest
VT: 21.4%
29.7%±6.9Highest
VT: 21.4%
Windsor and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
42.1%
VT: 43.8%
40.8%
VT: 43.8%
50.1%Highest
VT: 43.8%
39.7%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
7.3%±4.7
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
3.5%±2
VT: 7%
0.7%±0.8Lowest
VT: 7%
Randolph and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$75,069±$11k
8% below VT
$76,758±$6k
5% below VT
$92,267±$54kHighest
14% above VT
$52,484±$11kLowest
35% below VT
Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$235,400±$25k
26% below VT
$278,700±$38k
12% below VT
$446,000±$24kHighest
41% above VT
$207,500±$31kLowest
34% below VT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,095±$198
11% below VT
$1,172±$173Highest
5% below VT
—
$1,026±$89Lowest
17% below VT
Randolph and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,507Lowest
11% below VT
$4,698
7% below VT
$6,697Highest
33% above VT
$5,209
3% above VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
54.3%±20.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8
VT: 48.4%
0%±18.2Lowest
VT: 48.4%
31.5%±17
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
14.1%Highest
VT: 10.1%
7.7%
VT: 10.1%
6.4%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
7.8%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
53.6%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
67.2%
VT: 73.2%
79.8%Highest
VT: 73.2%
57.8%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1942Lowest
34 yrs older than VT
1971
5 yrs older than VT
1979Highest
3 yrs newer than VT
1945
31 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
18 minLowest
24% below VT
21 min
12% below VT
33 minHighest
39% above VT
23 min
3% below VT
Work from home
17.7%±7.6
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7
VT: 16.9%
19.4%±11.3Highest
VT: 16.9%
10.3%±5Lowest
VT: 16.9%
Underhill and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading #55 of 70 in VT #55 of 70 in VT #2 of 70 in VT #61 of 70 in VT
School district — Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District #401 —
High school in town — Randolph Union High School None in town —
Students per teacherat that high school —
9.4
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in Our Story None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.