Compare towns
Randolph vs Barre
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.5%).
Barre has the most kids (13.5% under 18).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Randolph | Barre |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 2,007Lowest |
8,412Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +5.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-6.2%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 50.5±7.7Highest 17% above VT |
42.2±6.6Lowest about the VT average |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 11%±5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
13.5%±3.8Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Barre and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Age 65+ | 24.2%±4.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
19.4%±3.9Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 42.1%Highest VT: 43.8% |
36.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 7.3%±4.7Highest VT: 7% |
3.4%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $75,069±$11kHighest 8% below VT |
$65,625±$7kLowest 19% below VT |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $235,400±$25kHighest 26% below VT |
$210,400±$15kLowest 34% below VT |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,095±$198Highest 11% below VT |
$1,093±$58Lowest 11% below VT |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,507Lowest 11% below VT |
$5,192Highest 3% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.3%±20.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
34.4%±10.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 14.1%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
17.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 53.6%Highest VT: 73.2% |
50.4%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1942Lowest 34 yrs older than VT |
1947Highest 29 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 18 minLowest 24% below VT |
19 minHighest 21% below VT |
| Work from home | 17.7%±7.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.5%±4.1Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Randolph and Barre are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #55 of 70 in VT | #19 of 70 in VT |
| School district | — | Barre Unified Union School District #97 · Central Vermont Career Center |
| High school in town | — | Spaulding Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.7 |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.
