Compare towns
Putney vs Sunderland vs Tunbridge
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Putney has the shortest commute (18 min average).
Sunderland has grown the fastest since 2010 (+10.5%).
Tunbridge has the most people working from home (25.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Putney | Sunderland | Tunbridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,622Highest |
1,269 |
1,253Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -3.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+10.5%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+4.1% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 37.2±5.2Lowest 14% below VT |
40.8±2.8 5% below VT |
42.7±8.3Highest about the VT average |
| Tunbridge and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.4%±4.1Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.6%±5.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
21.1%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
| Sunderland and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 18.1%±3.8 VT: 21.4% |
16.7%±2.7Lowest VT: 21.4% |
20.9%±1.6Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Tunbridge and Putney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 48.6%Highest VT: 43.8% |
41.4%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
42.9% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 20.4%±3.4Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±3.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3.6%±2 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $79,706±$18kLowest about the VT average |
$88,523±$16k 9% above VT |
$89,464±$26kHighest 10% above VT |
| Tunbridge and Sunderland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $300,000±$44kLowest 5% below VT |
$300,000±$43kLowest 5% below VT |
$315,300±$23kHighest about the VT average |
| Tunbridge and Putney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $508±$482Lowest 59% below VT |
$1,413±$242Highest 15% above VT |
$1,346±$128 9% above VT |
| Sunderland and Tunbridge are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,313Highest 5% above VT |
$4,136Lowest 18% below VT |
$4,645 8% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 54.2%±19.4 VT: 48.4% |
51.5%±61.5Lowest VT: 48.4% |
76.7%±100Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Tunbridge and Putney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16%Highest VT: 10.1% |
11.2%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
14.4% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 72.8%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
91.9%Highest VT: 73.2% |
84.2% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1977 1 yr newer than VT |
1973Lowest 3 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 18 minLowest 24% below VT |
23 min 4% below VT |
31 minHighest 31% above VT |
| Work from home | 16.9%±6.5 VT: 16.9% |
11.6%±5Lowest VT: 16.9% |
25.8%±8.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Tunbridge and Putney are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #32 of 70 in VT | — | — |
| School district | Windham Southeast Unified Union School District #96 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | First Branch Unified School District #82 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.