Compare towns
Prospect vs Wakefield vs Bethany
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Prospect has the most affordable homes ($355k median).
Wakefield has the most people working from home (24.6%).
Bethany has the highest household income ($166k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Prospect | Wakefield | Bethany |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,458 |
27,793Highest |
5,288Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +8.7% U.S.: +7.4% |
— |
| Median age | 46.8±3.9Highest 20% above U.S. |
42.4±1.7Lowest 9% above U.S. |
42.5±2.9 9% above U.S. |
| Prospect and Bethany are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.4%±4.1Highest U.S.: 22% |
20%±2.2Lowest U.S.: 22% |
20.3%±5.9 U.S.: 22% |
| Prospect and Bethany are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.5%±4.3Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
19%±1.9 U.S.: 17.2% |
17.2%±4.2Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Prospect and Wakefield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.3%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
59.7%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
58% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±1.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.4%±0.9 U.S.: 6.4% |
6.8%±3.7Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Bethany and Wakefield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $126,394±$18kLowest 57% above U.S. |
$134,306±$14k 66% above U.S. |
$166,236±$20kHighest 106% above U.S. |
| Bethany and Wakefield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $355,400±$21kLowest 7% above U.S. |
$723,500±$24kHighest 117% above U.S. |
$418,000±$42k 26% above U.S. |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,800±$433Lowest 27% above U.S. |
$1,958±$102Highest 39% above U.S. |
— |
| Wakefield and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,504Lowest 109% above U.S. |
$7,779 149% above U.S. |
$8,313Highest 167% above U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 45.3%±31.8Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
43.7%±7.9 U.S.: 51.1% |
0%±100Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Prospect and Wakefield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
4.9%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
2.3%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5% U.S.: 65.2% |
70.7%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
97.2%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 6 yrs older than U.S. |
1956Lowest 24 yrs older than U.S. |
1970 10 yrs older than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 4% above U.S. |
33 minHighest 26% above U.S. |
32 min 22% above U.S. |
| Work from home | 10.1%±3.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
24.6%±3.1Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
12%±5.2 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 149 in CT | #179 of 282 in MA | #30 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Regional School District 16 | Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational Technical · Wakefield | Bethany School District · Regional School District 05 |
| High school in town | None in town | Northeast Metro Regional Vocational | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.7 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.