Compare towns
Prospect vs Killingly vs Norwich
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Prospect has the highest household income ($126k).
Killingly has the most people working from home (11.1%).
Norwich has the most renters (46.2% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Prospect | Killingly | Norwich |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,458Lowest |
17,867 |
39,973Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | — | -0.9% CT: +0.9% |
| Median age | 46.8±3.9Highest 14% above CT |
39.5±3 4% below CT |
38.5±1.7Lowest 6% below CT |
| Kids under 18 | 21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
19.8%±2.3Lowest CT: 20.2% |
20.9%±1.8 CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.5%±4.3Highest CT: 18.5% |
19.7%±2.4 CT: 18.5% |
16.9%±1.7Lowest CT: 18.5% |
| Prospect and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
22.9%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
23.1% CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
5.4%±1.9 CT: 7.1% |
5.6%±1.2Highest CT: 7.1% |
| Norwich and Killingly are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $126,394±$18kHighest 32% above CT |
$84,350±$8k 12% below CT |
$65,024±$5kLowest 32% below CT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $355,400±$21kHighest 3% below CT |
$288,600±$15k 21% below CT |
$242,300±$11kLowest 34% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
$1,044±$141Lowest 30% below CT |
$1,253±$68 16% below CT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,504Highest about the CT average |
$3,922Lowest 41% below CT |
$4,703 29% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 45.3%±31.8 CT: 52.6% |
42.8%±10.9Lowest CT: 52.6% |
56.2%±7.2Highest CT: 52.6% |
| Norwich and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
11.4% CT: 10% |
16.7%Highest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
71.6% CT: 66.5% |
53.8%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 7 yrs newer than CT |
1968 1 yr newer than CT |
1957Lowest 10 yrs older than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 4% above CT |
28 minHighest 5% above CT |
24 minLowest 9% below CT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±3.2 CT: 16% |
11.1%±2.3Highest CT: 16% |
7.2%±2Lowest CT: 16% |
| Killingly and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 149 in CT | #136 of 149 in CT | #133 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Regional School District 16 | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Eastern Connecticut Regional Educational Service Center (EAS | Connecticut Technical Education and Career System · Norwich School District |
| High school in town | None in town | Killingly High School | Norwich Free Academy |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 11.1Lowest |
14.8Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.