Compare towns
Prospect vs Colebrook vs Putnam
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Prospect has the most kids (21.4% under 18).
Colebrook has the oldest population (median age 52.1).
Putnam has the most renters (40.2% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Prospect | Colebrook | Putnam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,458Highest |
1,494Lowest |
9,292 |
| Median age | 46.8±3.9 14% above CT |
52.1±5Highest 27% above CT |
43.7±3Lowest 6% above CT |
| Colebrook and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
17.9%±3.9Lowest CT: 20.2% |
18.6%±3.6 CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.5%±4.3 CT: 18.5% |
26%±4.2Highest CT: 18.5% |
18.5%±3.1Lowest CT: 18.5% |
| Colebrook and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
36.6% CT: 42.5% |
20%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
5.4%±1.8Highest CT: 7.1% |
3.9%±1.4 CT: 7.1% |
| Colebrook and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $126,394±$18kHighest 32% above CT |
$111,250±$17k 16% above CT |
$70,561±$7kLowest 26% below CT |
| Prospect and Colebrook are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $355,400±$21kHighest 3% below CT |
$342,800±$19k 7% below CT |
$269,200±$11kLowest 27% below CT |
| Prospect and Colebrook are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
$1,333±$626 10% below CT |
$1,149±$44Lowest 23% below CT |
| Prospect and Colebrook are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,504Highest about the CT average |
$6,211 7% below CT |
$3,860Lowest 42% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 45.3%±31.8Highest CT: 52.6% |
42.1%±55 CT: 52.6% |
37.7%±11.6Lowest CT: 52.6% |
| Prospect and Colebrook are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.2%Lowest CT: 10% |
8.3% CT: 10% |
11.5%Highest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
91.6% CT: 66.5% |
59.8%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974Highest 7 yrs newer than CT |
1960Lowest 7 yrs older than CT |
1961 6 yrs older than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 min 4% above CT |
34 minHighest 29% above CT |
25 minLowest 6% below CT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±3.2Highest CT: 16% |
7%±3.8Lowest CT: 16% |
9%±2.8 CT: 16% |
| Prospect and Putnam are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 149 in CT | — | #128 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Regional School District 16 | Colebrook School District | Putnam School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Putnam High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 9.5 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.