Compare towns
Prospect vs Bridgewater vs Naugatuck
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Connecticut.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Prospect has the most kids (21.4% under 18).
Bridgewater has the most expensive homes ($693k median).
Naugatuck has the most affordable homes ($259k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Prospect | Bridgewater | Naugatuck |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 9,458 |
1,658Lowest |
31,800Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | — | -1.1% CT: +0.9% |
| Median age | 46.8±3.9 14% above CT |
55.9±4.4Highest 36% above CT |
39.8±2.4Lowest 3% below CT |
| Kids under 18 | 21.4%±4.1Highest CT: 20.2% |
14.4%±2.9Lowest CT: 20.2% |
19.9%±2.3 CT: 20.2% |
| Prospect and Naugatuck are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 24.5%±4.3 CT: 18.5% |
37%±6.6Highest CT: 18.5% |
15.6%±2Lowest CT: 18.5% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 40.3% CT: 42.5% |
59.3%Highest CT: 42.5% |
32.2%Lowest CT: 42.5% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.5%±1.8Lowest CT: 7.1% |
6.8%±5.3 CT: 7.1% |
7.8%±1.7Highest CT: 7.1% |
| Naugatuck and Bridgewater are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $126,394±$18k 32% above CT |
$159,365±$5kHighest 66% above CT |
$96,324±$9kLowest about the CT average |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $355,400±$21k 3% below CT |
$693,000±$75kHighest 89% above CT |
$259,100±$13kLowest 29% below CT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,800±$433Highest 21% above CT |
$1,467±$233 about the CT average |
$1,369±$58Lowest 8% below CT |
| Prospect and Bridgewater are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $6,504 about the CT average |
$6,869Highest 3% above CT |
$6,362Lowest 4% below CT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 45.3%±31.8 CT: 52.6% |
47.8%±43Highest CT: 52.6% |
42.2%±9.4Lowest CT: 52.6% |
| Bridgewater and Prospect are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 3.2% CT: 10% |
3%Lowest CT: 10% |
6.3%Highest CT: 10% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 93.5%Highest CT: 66.5% |
92.1% CT: 66.5% |
67.8%Lowest CT: 66.5% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1974 7 yrs newer than CT |
1975Highest 8 yrs newer than CT |
1971Lowest 4 yrs newer than CT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minLowest 4% above CT |
29 min 11% above CT |
33 minHighest 26% above CT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±3.2Lowest CT: 16% |
25.2%±5Highest CT: 16% |
15%±2.8 CT: 16% |
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #50 of 149 in CT | — | #116 of 149 in CT |
| School district | Regional School District 16 | Regional School District 12 | Naugatuck School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | Naugatuck High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | — | 15.2 |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
CT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.