Compare towns
Proctor vs Whitingham vs West Rutland
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
Whitingham has the most expensive homes ($262k median).
West Rutland has the most people working from home (13.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Proctor | Whitingham | West Rutland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,794 |
1,368Lowest |
2,240Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1% VT: +2.8% |
-4.8%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
46.4±7.1 8% above VT |
47.8±5.1Highest 11% above VT |
| West Rutland and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5 VT: 17.9% |
17.2%±4.9Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.4%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.8%±5.9 VT: 21.4% |
| Whitingham and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
35.2%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
1.9%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,167±$12kHighest 9% below VT |
$70,625±$11k 13% below VT |
$61,161±$27kLowest 25% below VT |
| Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $209,900±$17k 34% below VT |
$262,300±$30kHighest 17% below VT |
$196,400±$27kLowest 38% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,029±$202Highest 17% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$883±$151 28% below VT |
| Proctor and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,032 20% below VT |
$5,055Highest about the VT average |
$3,498Lowest 31% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.3%±16.2Lowest VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
60.1%±22.2 VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and West Rutland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
15.5% VT: 10.1% |
6.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
85.2% VT: 73.2% |
81.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1974Highest 2 yrs older than VT |
1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 min 6% below VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
22 minLowest 9% below VT |
| Work from home | 9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2 VT: 16.9% |
13.6%±4.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| West Rutland and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | — |
| High school in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | Twin Valley Middle High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7Highest |
7.8Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.