Compare towns
Proctor vs Whitingham vs Elmore
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Proctor has the shortest commute (22 min average).
Whitingham has the most people working from home (9.7%).
Elmore has grown the fastest since 2010 (+3.6%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Proctor | Whitingham | Elmore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,794Highest |
1,368 |
964Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.3% VT: +2.8% |
-1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+3.6%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
46.4±7.1Highest 8% above VT |
45±3.5 4% above VT |
| Whitingham and Elmore are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
19.8%±4.5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
23.4%±9.5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Elmore and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.4%±2.5 VT: 21.4% |
31.1%±2.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
14.6%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
32.8% VT: 43.8% |
47.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.2%±1.9 VT: 7% |
1.3%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,167±$12k 9% below VT |
$70,625±$11kLowest 13% below VT |
$98,750±$24kHighest 22% above VT |
| Elmore and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$262,300±$30k 17% below VT |
$315,800±$47kHighest about the VT average |
| Elmore and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,029±$202 17% below VT |
$673±$150Lowest 45% below VT |
$1,225±$263Highest about the VT average |
| Elmore and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,032Lowest 20% below VT |
$5,055 about the VT average |
$5,066Highest about the VT average |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
62.7%±47.3Highest VT: 48.4% |
31.8%±65.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Whitingham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
15.5% VT: 10.1% |
3.3%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.7% VT: 73.2% |
85.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
92.8%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
1978Highest 2 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 6% below VT |
38 minHighest 62% above VT |
29 min 25% above VT |
| Work from home | 9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
9.7%±5.2Highest VT: 16.9% |
9.4%±4.3Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Whitingham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Twin Valley Unified School District #75 | Elmore-Morristown Unified Union School District #90 |
| High school in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | Twin Valley Middle High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7Highest |
7.8Lowest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.