Compare towns

Proctor vs Randolph vs Pittsford vs Proctor

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Proctor has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Randolph has the most expensive homes ($279k median).
Pittsford has the most affordable homes ($197k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureProctorRandolphPittsfordProctor
People
Population
1,794
4,843Highest
2,892
1,586Lowest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
+1.3%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-0.1%
VT: +2.8%
-4.3%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
—
Median age
42.4±6.4
about the VT average
40.4±7.4Lowest
6% below VT
47.7±6.3Highest
11% above VT
47.3±8.9
10% above VT
Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
21.8%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
17.3%±4.4
VT: 17.9%
15.1%±5.2Lowest
VT: 17.9%
17.2%±5
VT: 17.9%
Proctor and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
22.4%±2.5Lowest
VT: 21.4%
22.9%±4.2
VT: 21.4%
25.4%±6.1Highest
VT: 21.4%
23.5%±2.6
VT: 21.4%
Pittsford and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
28.1%
VT: 43.8%
40.8%Highest
VT: 43.8%
37%
VT: 43.8%
28%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3.6%±1.7
VT: 7%
11.2%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
3%±2.1Lowest
VT: 7%
3.9%±1.9
VT: 7%
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$74,167±$12k
9% below VT
$76,758±$6kHighest
5% below VT
$69,705±$7kLowest
14% below VT
$75,060±$12k
8% below VT
Randolph and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$209,900±$17k
34% below VT
$278,700±$38kHighest
12% below VT
$197,000±$33kLowest
38% below VT
$206,000±$20k
35% below VT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,029±$202
17% below VT
$1,172±$173Highest
5% below VT
$781±$167Lowest
37% below VT
$1,059±$200
14% below VT
Randolph and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$4,032
20% below VT
$4,698Highest
7% below VT
$3,378Lowest
33% below VT
$3,944
22% below VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
37.3%±16.2
VT: 48.4%
54.1%±17.8Highest
VT: 48.4%
18.5%±12.3Lowest
VT: 48.4%
39.4%±15.6
VT: 48.4%
Randolph and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
16.2%Highest
VT: 10.1%
7.7%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
11.3%
VT: 10.1%
10%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
86.7%Highest
VT: 73.2%
67.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
80.6%
VT: 73.2%
86.3%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1971
5 yrs older than VT
1972Highest
4 yrs older than VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
22 min
6% below VT
21 minLowest
12% below VT
25 minHighest
7% above VT
22 min
5% below VT
Work from home
9.4%±4.6Lowest
VT: 16.9%
12.9%±4.7Highest
VT: 16.9%
10.1%±6.9
VT: 16.9%
10%±5
VT: 16.9%
Randolph and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — #55 of 70 in VT #54 of 70 in VT —
School district Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 —
High school in town Proctor Junior/Senior High School Randolph Union High School None in town —
Students per teacherat that high school
8.7Lowest
9.4Highest
— —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.