Compare towns
Proctor vs Randolph vs Corinth
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Proctor has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Randolph has the most expensive homes ($279k median).
Corinth has grown the fastest since 2010 (+6.4%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Proctor | Randolph | Corinth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,794 |
4,843Highest |
1,539Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.3% VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+6.4%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.4±6.4 about the VT average |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
48.4±9.6Highest 12% above VT |
| Corinth and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4 VT: 17.9% |
16.8%±4.6Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.4%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
27.3%±3.5Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Corinth and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Highest VT: 43.8% |
29.3% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±1.7 VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
1.2%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,167±$12kLowest 9% below VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$89,167±$29kHighest 10% above VT |
| Corinth and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $209,900±$17kLowest 34% below VT |
$278,700±$38kHighest 12% below VT |
$213,800±$34k 32% below VT |
| Randolph and Corinth are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,029±$202Lowest 17% below VT |
$1,172±$173 5% below VT |
$1,267±$510Highest about the VT average |
| Corinth and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,032 20% below VT |
$4,698Highest 7% below VT |
$3,584Lowest 29% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
17.9%±29.8Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
12.4% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.7% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
88.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1971 5 yrs older than VT |
1976Highest same as VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 min 6% below VT |
21 minLowest 12% below VT |
35 minHighest 49% above VT |
| Work from home | 9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7 VT: 16.9% |
23%±10.5Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Corinth and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | — |
| High school in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | Randolph Union High School | — |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7Lowest |
9.4Highest |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.