Compare towns
Proctor vs Danby vs Pittsford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Proctor has grown the fastest since 2010 (+1.3%).
Danby has the most expensive homes ($272k median).
Pittsford has the most renters (19.4% rent).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Proctor | Danby | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,794 |
1,133Lowest |
2,892Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +1.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.1% VT: +2.8% |
-4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 42.4±6.4Lowest about the VT average |
52.6±4.8Highest 22% above VT |
47.7±6.3 11% above VT |
| Danby and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.8%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.6%±3.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
| Proctor and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 22.4%±2.5Lowest VT: 21.4% |
24.3%±2.6 VT: 21.4% |
25.4%±6.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsford and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
34.8% VT: 43.8% |
37%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.6%±1.7Highest VT: 7% |
2.5%±1.9Lowest VT: 7% |
3%±2.1 VT: 7% |
| Proctor and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $74,167±$12k 9% below VT |
$77,321±$13kHighest 5% below VT |
$69,705±$7kLowest 14% below VT |
| Danby and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $209,900±$17k 34% below VT |
$272,400±$41kHighest 14% below VT |
$197,000±$33kLowest 38% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,029±$202Highest 17% below VT |
$794±$166 36% below VT |
$781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
| Proctor and Danby are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $4,032 20% below VT |
$4,543Highest 10% below VT |
$3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 37.3%±16.2 VT: 48.4% |
41.4%±34.6Highest VT: 48.4% |
18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Danby and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.2%Highest VT: 10.1% |
9.4%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
11.3% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.7% VT: 73.2% |
89.3%Highest VT: 73.2% |
80.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1981Highest 5 yrs newer than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 6% below VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
25 min 7% above VT |
| Work from home | 9.4%±4.6Lowest VT: 16.9% |
12.1%±5.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±6.9 VT: 16.9% |
| Danby and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | — | #54 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 | Taconic and Green Regional School District #63 | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 |
| High school in town | Proctor Junior/Senior High School | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 8.7 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.