Compare towns
Proctor vs Reading vs Wallingford
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Proctor has the most affordable homes ($206k median).
Reading has the most people working from home (22.9%).
Wallingford has the youngest population (median age 45.9).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Proctor | Reading | Wallingford |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 1,586 |
699Lowest |
2,286Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | — | +3.2%Highest VT: +2.8% |
+2.4%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.3±8.9 10% above VT |
51.1±7.6Highest 19% above VT |
45.9±10.8Lowest 6% above VT |
| Reading and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 17.2%±5Lowest VT: 17.9% |
18.5%±4.2 VT: 17.9% |
18.7%±5Highest VT: 17.9% |
| Wallingford and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 23.5%±2.6Lowest VT: 21.4% |
28.2%±3.3Highest VT: 21.4% |
23.9%±3.2 VT: 21.4% |
| Reading and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 28%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
46%Highest VT: 43.8% |
30.3% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.9%±1.9Highest VT: 7% |
3.1%±2.5 VT: 7% |
1.5%±1.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Proctor and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $75,060±$12kLowest 8% below VT |
$85,000±$19kHighest 5% above VT |
$80,230±$15k about the VT average |
| Reading and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $206,000±$20kLowest 35% below VT |
$377,200±$72kHighest 19% above VT |
$261,900±$44k 17% below VT |
| Reading and Wallingford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,059±$200 14% below VT |
$1,100±$331Highest 11% below VT |
$891±$95Lowest 28% below VT |
| Reading and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,944Lowest 22% below VT |
$5,754Highest 14% above VT |
$4,355 14% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 39.4%±15.6 VT: 48.4% |
63.3%±31.7Highest VT: 48.4% |
14.3%±13.5Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Reading and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 10%Highest VT: 10.1% |
8.4% VT: 10.1% |
7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 86.3%Highest VT: 73.2% |
84.9% VT: 73.2% |
82.5%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1938Lowest 38 yrs older than VT |
1969 7 yrs older than VT |
1971Highest 5 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 22 minLowest 5% below VT |
33 minHighest 41% above VT |
25 min 6% above VT |
| Work from home | 10%±5 VT: 16.9% |
22.9%±10.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
7.1%±3.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
| Reading and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| School district | — | Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 | Mill River Unified Union School District #52 |
| High school in town | — | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.