Compare towns

Proctor vs Proctor vs Worcester vs Whitingham

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Proctor has the most affordable homes ($206k median).
Proctor has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Worcester has the most people working from home (23.6%).
Whitingham has the most renters (14.8% rent).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureProctorProctorWorcesterWhitingham
People
Population
1,586
1,794Highest
831Lowest
1,368
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
+1.3%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-3.4%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
-1%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
47.3±8.9Highest
10% above VT
42.4±6.4Lowest
about the VT average
47±2.7
9% above VT
46.4±7.1
8% above VT
Proctor and Worcester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
17.2%±5
VT: 17.9%
21.8%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
12.8%±3.9Lowest
VT: 17.9%
19.8%±4.5
VT: 17.9%
Proctor and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.5%±2.6
VT: 21.4%
22.4%±2.5
VT: 21.4%
19.5%±2.5Lowest
VT: 21.4%
31.1%±2.3Highest
VT: 21.4%
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
28%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
28.1%
VT: 43.8%
53%Highest
VT: 43.8%
32.8%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3.9%±1.9
VT: 7%
3.6%±1.7
VT: 7%
6.9%±4.7Highest
VT: 7%
2.2%±1.9Lowest
VT: 7%
Worcester and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$75,060±$12kHighest
8% below VT
$74,167±$12k
9% below VT
$73,833±$18k
9% below VT
$70,625±$11kLowest
13% below VT
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$206,000±$20kLowest
35% below VT
$209,900±$17k
34% below VT
$271,100±$27kHighest
14% below VT
$262,300±$30k
17% below VT
Worcester and Whitingham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,059±$200Highest
14% below VT
$1,029±$202
17% below VT
$1,023±$136
17% below VT
$673±$150Lowest
45% below VT
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,944Lowest
22% below VT
$4,032
20% below VT
$4,421
12% below VT
$5,055Highest
about the VT average
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
39.4%±15.6
VT: 48.4%
37.3%±16.2
VT: 48.4%
25.5%±37Lowest
VT: 48.4%
62.7%±47.3Highest
VT: 48.4%
Whitingham and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
10%
VT: 10.1%
16.2%Highest
VT: 10.1%
5.9%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
15.5%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
86.3%
VT: 73.2%
86.7%Highest
VT: 73.2%
85.9%
VT: 73.2%
85.2%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1976Highest
same as VT
1974
2 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
22 min
5% below VT
22 minLowest
6% below VT
29 min
22% above VT
38 minHighest
62% above VT
Work from home
10%±5
VT: 16.9%
9.4%±4.6Lowest
VT: 16.9%
23.6%±4.8Highest
VT: 16.9%
9.7%±5.2
VT: 16.9%
Schools
School district — Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 Washington Central Unified Union School District #92 Twin Valley Unified School District #75
High school in town — Proctor Junior/Senior High School None in town Twin Valley Middle High School
Students per teacherat that high school —
8.7Highest
—
7.8Lowest
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.