Compare towns

Proctor vs Ludlow vs Proctor vs Pittsford

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Proctor has the highest household income ($75k).
Ludlow has the most people working from home (17.3%).
Proctor has the most kids (21.8% under 18).
Pittsford has the most affordable homes ($197k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasureProctorLudlowProctorPittsford
People
Population
1,586
808Lowest
1,794
2,892Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census —
-4.7%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+1.3%Highest
VT: +2.8%
-4.3%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
47.3±8.9
10% above VT
48.7±5.6Highest
13% above VT
42.4±6.4Lowest
about the VT average
47.7±6.3
11% above VT
Ludlow and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
17.2%±5
VT: 17.9%
13.1%±3.7Lowest
VT: 17.9%
21.8%±4.4Highest
VT: 17.9%
15.1%±5.2
VT: 17.9%
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
23.5%±2.6
VT: 21.4%
30.4%±0.5Highest
VT: 21.4%
22.4%±2.5Lowest
VT: 21.4%
25.4%±6.1
VT: 21.4%
Ludlow and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
28%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
39.3%Highest
VT: 43.8%
28.1%
VT: 43.8%
37%
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
3.9%±1.9Highest
VT: 7%
2.6%±1.6Lowest
VT: 7%
3.6%±1.7
VT: 7%
3%±2.1
VT: 7%
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$75,060±$12kHighest
8% below VT
$56,667±$19kLowest
30% below VT
$74,167±$12k
9% below VT
$69,705±$7k
14% below VT
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$206,000±$20k
35% below VT
$304,000±$32kHighest
4% below VT
$209,900±$17k
34% below VT
$197,000±$33kLowest
38% below VT
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,059±$200Highest
14% below VT
$1,018±$91
18% below VT
$1,029±$202
17% below VT
$781±$167Lowest
37% below VT
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$3,944
22% below VT
$4,237Highest
16% below VT
$4,032
20% below VT
$3,378Lowest
33% below VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
39.4%±15.6Highest
VT: 48.4%
33%±13.8
VT: 48.4%
37.3%±16.2
VT: 48.4%
18.5%±12.3Lowest
VT: 48.4%
Proctor and Proctor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
10%
VT: 10.1%
8.7%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
16.2%Highest
VT: 10.1%
11.3%
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
86.3%
VT: 73.2%
51.4%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
86.7%Highest
VT: 73.2%
80.6%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1972Highest
4 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
22 min
5% below VT
21 minLowest
10% below VT
22 min
6% below VT
25 minHighest
7% above VT
Work from home
10%±5
VT: 16.9%
17.3%±6.4Highest
VT: 16.9%
9.4%±4.6Lowest
VT: 16.9%
10.1%±6.9
VT: 16.9%
Ludlow and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — — #54 of 70 in VT
School district — — Quarry Valley Unified Union School District #70 Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53
High school in town — — Proctor Junior/Senior High School None in town
Students per teacherat that high school — —
8.7
—
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet None yet

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.