Compare towns
Poland vs Grantham vs Minot
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against the U.S..
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Poland has the most people working from home (21.9%).
Grantham has grown the fastest since 2010 (+14%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Poland | Grantham | Minot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 5,954Highest |
3,465 |
2,794Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +9.9% U.S.: +7.4% |
+14%Highest U.S.: +7.4% |
+6.1%Lowest U.S.: +7.4% |
| Median age | 44.2±9.4Lowest 14% above U.S. |
50.4±7.5Highest 30% above U.S. |
49±6.1 26% above U.S. |
| Grantham and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 21.4%±5.6Highest U.S.: 22% |
19.1%±6.6 U.S.: 22% |
16.4%±4.4Lowest U.S.: 22% |
| Poland and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 17.8%±4.3 U.S.: 17.2% |
17%±6.9Lowest U.S.: 17.2% |
21.3%±4.2Highest U.S.: 17.2% |
| Minot and Poland are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 23.8%Lowest U.S.: 35.7% |
59.6%Highest U.S.: 35.7% |
25.9% U.S.: 35.7% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 4.2%±2.8Lowest U.S.: 6.4% |
4.8%±6 U.S.: 6.4% |
5.1%±2.2Highest U.S.: 6.4% |
| Minot and Grantham are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $85,557±$23kLowest 6% above U.S. |
$106,403±$54kHighest 32% above U.S. |
$95,655±$17k 18% above U.S. |
| Grantham and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $283,600±$44kLowest 15% below U.S. |
$343,100±$39kHighest 3% above U.S. |
$294,900±$26k 11% below U.S. |
| Grantham and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,198±$128Highest 15% below U.S. |
— | $878±$801Lowest 38% below U.S. |
| Poland and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $2,774 11% below U.S. |
$7,605Highest 144% above U.S. |
$2,602Lowest 17% below U.S. |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 61.6%±30.7Highest U.S.: 51.1% |
— | 35.7%±40.7Lowest U.S.: 51.1% |
| Poland and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 16.6%Highest U.S.: 12.5% |
0%Lowest U.S.: 12.5% |
6.2% U.S.: 12.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 81.9%Lowest U.S.: 65.2% |
100%Highest U.S.: 65.2% |
96% U.S.: 65.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1988 8 yrs newer than U.S. |
1987Lowest 7 yrs newer than U.S. |
1994Highest 14 yrs newer than U.S. |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 28 minHighest 6% above U.S. |
23 minLowest 15% below U.S. |
25 min 6% below U.S. |
| Work from home | 21.9%±10.6Highest U.S.: 15.1% |
13.8%±6.2Lowest U.S.: 15.1% |
16.8%±5.7 U.S.: 15.1% |
| Poland and Minot are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #81 of 133 in ME | #6 of 120 in NH | #78 of 133 in ME |
| School district | RSU 16 | Grantham School District | RSU 16 |
| High school in town | Poland Regional H S | None in town | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 12.2 |
— | — |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
U.S. average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.