Compare towns
Plaistow vs New Ipswich vs Claremont
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against New Hampshire.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Plaistow has grown the fastest since 2010 (+2.9%).
New Ipswich has the most kids (29.9% under 18).
Claremont has the most affordable homes ($205k median).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Plaistow | New Ipswich | Claremont |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 7,861 |
5,310Lowest |
13,078Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | +2.9%Highest NH: +4.6% |
+2.1% NH: +4.6% |
-3%Lowest NH: +4.6% |
| Median age | 40.1±3.7 7% below NH |
36.9±2.4Lowest 15% below NH |
42.6±3.5Highest about the NH average |
| Claremont and Plaistow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 19.8%±4.3 NH: 18.2% |
29.9%±5.7Highest NH: 18.2% |
19.1%±2.8Lowest NH: 18.2% |
| Age 65+ | 17.4%±3.7 NH: 20.1% |
12.3%±3Lowest NH: 20.1% |
20.8%±3.1Highest NH: 20.1% |
| Claremont and Plaistow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 34.9%Highest NH: 40.6% |
32.1% NH: 40.6% |
21.7%Lowest NH: 40.6% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3.3%±1.4Highest NH: 6% |
2.6%±1.4 NH: 6% |
2.5%±1.2Lowest NH: 6% |
| Plaistow and New Ipswich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $108,317±$13k 9% above NH |
$110,507±$9kHighest 12% above NH |
$59,096±$8kLowest 40% below NH |
| New Ipswich and Plaistow are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $404,500±$32kHighest about the NH average |
$392,400±$31k about the NH average |
$204,600±$17kLowest 49% below NH |
| Plaistow and New Ipswich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,664±$187Highest 12% above NH |
$882±$469Lowest 41% below NH |
$1,146±$83 23% below NH |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $7,194Highest 8% above NH |
$5,647Lowest 15% below NH |
$5,774 13% below NH |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 55.3%±16.9Lowest NH: 48.2% |
61.7%±41.5 NH: 48.2% |
63.6%±12.5Highest NH: 48.2% |
| Claremont and New Ipswich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 4.5% NH: 7.2% |
1.4%Lowest NH: 7.2% |
13.5%Highest NH: 7.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 78.1% NH: 72.8% |
82.7%Highest NH: 72.8% |
57.2%Lowest NH: 72.8% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1978 1 yr older than NH |
1986Highest 7 yrs newer than NH |
1957Lowest 22 yrs older than NH |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 29 min 7% above NH |
33 minHighest 22% above NH |
24 minLowest 9% below NH |
| Work from home | 13.6%±4Highest NH: 16.8% |
12%±4.8 NH: 16.8% |
8.6%±2.9Lowest NH: 16.8% |
| Plaistow and New Ipswich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #66 of 120 in NH | #82 of 120 in NH | #103 of 120 in NH |
| School district | Timberlane Regional School District | Mascenic Regional School District | Claremont School District |
| High school in town | Timberlane Regional High School | Mascenic Regional High School | Stevens High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | 11.4Lowest |
11.7 |
12.7Highest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet | None yet |
NH average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.