Compare towns
Pittsford vs Norwich vs Barnet
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Pittsford has the most affordable homes ($197k median).
Norwich has grown the fastest since 2010 (+5.8%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Pittsford | Norwich | Barnet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,892 |
3,640Highest |
1,855Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+5.8%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-2.6% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±6.3Highest 11% above VT |
40.8±3.2Lowest 5% below VT |
47.7±5.3Highest 11% above VT |
| Kids under 18 | 15.1%±5.2Lowest VT: 17.9% |
24%±5.1Highest VT: 17.9% |
21.6%±4.9 VT: 17.9% |
| Norwich and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 25.4%±6.1 VT: 21.4% |
16%±3.4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
28.8%±3.8Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Barnet and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37% VT: 43.8% |
81%Highest VT: 43.8% |
35.6%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±2.1 VT: 7% |
4.8%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
1%±0.9Lowest VT: 7% |
| Norwich and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $69,705±$7k 14% below VT |
$140,313±$12kHighest 73% above VT |
$67,386±$15kLowest 17% below VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $197,000±$33kLowest 38% below VT |
$637,500±$76kHighest 101% above VT |
$247,900±$24k 22% below VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
$1,460±$322Highest 18% above VT |
$974±$72 21% below VT |
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
$10,000+Highest at least 98% above VT |
$4,489 11% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
30.7%±19.9 VT: 48.4% |
59.3%±29.9Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Barnet and Norwich are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 11.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
2.8%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
8.2% VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.6%Highest VT: 73.2% |
71.9%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
79.9% VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1982Highest 6 yrs newer than VT |
1974 2 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 min 7% above VT |
19 minLowest 19% below VT |
28 minHighest 17% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±6.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
21%±5.3Highest VT: 16.9% |
13.3%±4.5 VT: 16.9% |
| Norwich and Barnet are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #54 of 70 in VT | #1 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | Norwich School District | Caledonia Cooperative Unified School District #78 |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.