Compare towns
Pittsford vs Lincoln
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Pittsford has the most affordable homes ($197k median).
Lincoln has grown the fastest since 2010 (+4.1%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Pittsford | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | ||
| People | ||
| Population | 2,892Highest |
1,394Lowest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
+4.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±6.3Highest 11% above VT |
45.7±3.6Lowest 6% above VT |
| Pittsford and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Kids under 18 | 15.1%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
15.1%±3.7 VT: 17.9% |
| Age 65+ | 25.4%±6.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.3%±3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsford and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
43.5%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±2.1Highest VT: 7% |
2.9%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
| Pittsford and Lincoln are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Cost of living | ||
| Household incomemedian | $69,705±$7kLowest 14% below VT |
$96,667±$18kHighest 19% above VT |
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $197,000±$33kLowest 38% below VT |
$365,200±$30kHighest 15% above VT |
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
$870±$47Highest 29% below VT |
| Lincoln and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
$6,100Highest 21% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 18.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
49.1%±25.5Highest VT: 48.4% |
| Lincoln and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Below poverty line | 11.3%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.5%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | ||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.6%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
88.1%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972Lowest 4 yrs older than VT |
1977Highest 1 yr newer than VT |
| Getting to work | ||
| Average commuteone way | 25 minLowest 7% above VT |
30 minHighest 26% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±6.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
18.8%±5.6Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Lincoln and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | ||
| Schools | ||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #54 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | Lincoln Town School District |
| High school in town | None in town | None in town |
| On TownTapestry | ||
| Old photos in Our Story | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.

