Compare towns
Pittsford vs Enosburgh vs Chester
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Pittsford has the most affordable homes ($197k median).
Enosburgh has the most kids (21% under 18).
Chester has the most people working from home (14%).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Pittsford | Enosburgh | Chester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 2,892 |
2,804Lowest |
2,992Highest |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -4.3%Highest VT: +2.8% |
— | -4.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 47.7±6.3 11% above VT |
40.6±3.9Lowest 6% below VT |
49.7±4.7Highest 15% above VT |
| Chester and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 15.1%±5.2 VT: 17.9% |
21%±4.2Highest VT: 17.9% |
14.1%±4.7Lowest VT: 17.9% |
| Enosburgh and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 25.4%±6.1 VT: 21.4% |
17.9%±3.3Lowest VT: 21.4% |
29.8%±7.9Highest VT: 21.4% |
| Chester and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 37%Highest VT: 43.8% |
20.1%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
33.1% VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 3%±2.1Lowest VT: 7% |
5.4%±2.4Highest VT: 7% |
5.1%±4 VT: 7% |
| Enosburgh and Chester are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $69,705±$7kHighest 14% below VT |
$63,828±$17k 21% below VT |
$62,125±$8kLowest 23% below VT |
| Pittsford and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $197,000±$33kLowest 38% below VT |
$223,100±$39k 30% below VT |
$232,900±$44kHighest 26% below VT |
| Chester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $781±$167Lowest 37% below VT |
$852±$87 31% below VT |
$960±$44Highest 22% below VT |
| Chester and Enosburgh are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $3,378Lowest 33% below VT |
$3,624 28% below VT |
$4,262Highest 15% below VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 18.5%±12.3 VT: 48.4% |
48.9%±11.2Highest VT: 48.4% |
11.5%±12.3Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Below poverty line | 11.3% VT: 10.1% |
13.9%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 80.6% VT: 73.2% |
75.7%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
86.7%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
1972 4 yrs older than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 25 minLowest 7% above VT |
32 minHighest 36% above VT |
28 min 18% above VT |
| Work from home | 10.1%±6.9Lowest VT: 16.9% |
10.1%±4.4Lowest VT: 16.9% |
14%±6.9Highest VT: 16.9% |
| Chester and Pittsford are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | #54 of 70 in VT | #26 of 70 in VT | #49 of 70 in VT |
| School district | Otter Valley Unified Union School District #53 | Enosburgh-Richford Unified Union School District #88 | Green Mountain Unified School District #77 |
| High school in town | None in town | Enosburg Falls Middle/High School | Green Mountain Union High School |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 10.4Highest |
8.7Lowest |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.