Compare towns

Pittsfield vs Reading vs Windsor vs Windsor

Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.

What stands out worked out from the figures below

Pittsfield has the most people working from home (28.1%).
Reading has the highest household income ($85k).
Windsor has the most affordable homes ($170k median).

What matters to you?

Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.

MeasurePittsfieldReadingWindsorWindsor
People
Population
391Lowest
699
2,060
3,554Highest
Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census
-7.7%Lowest
VT: +2.8%
+3.2%
VT: +2.8%
+3.5%Highest
VT: +2.8%
+0.2%
VT: +2.8%
Median age
53.8±3.5Highest
25% above VT
51.1±7.6
19% above VT
44.6±12.3Lowest
3% above VT
44.8±6.5
4% above VT
Pittsfield and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Kids under 18
13.6%±8.4Lowest
VT: 17.9%
18.5%±4.2
VT: 17.9%
21.1%±8.8Highest
VT: 17.9%
19.5%±5.2
VT: 17.9%
Windsor and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Age 65+
30.4%±7.1Highest
VT: 21.4%
28.2%±3.3Lowest
VT: 21.4%
29.2%±8
VT: 21.4%
29.7%±6.9
VT: 21.4%
Pittsfield and Windsor are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+
45.4%
VT: 43.8%
46%Highest
VT: 43.8%
40%
VT: 43.8%
39.7%Lowest
VT: 43.8%
Enrolled in collegeshare of residents
2.8%±3.5
VT: 7%
3.1%±2.5Highest
VT: 7%
1.2%±1.4
VT: 7%
0.7%±0.8Lowest
VT: 7%
Reading and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Cost of living
Household incomemedian
$65,852±$12k
19% below VT
$85,000±$19kHighest
5% above VT
$51,197±$4kLowest
37% below VT
$52,484±$11k
35% below VT
Reading and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Home valuemedian, owner-occupied
$313,300±$73k
about the VT average
$377,200±$72kHighest
19% above VT
$170,300±$22kLowest
46% below VT
$207,500±$31k
34% below VT
Reading and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Rentmedian gross, monthly
$1,035±$140
16% below VT
$1,100±$331Highest
11% below VT
$1,002±$107Lowest
19% below VT
$1,026±$89
17% below VT
Reading and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Property taxmedian, yearly
$5,181
about the VT average
$5,754Highest
14% above VT
$4,878Lowest
3% below VT
$5,209
3% above VT
Renters paying 30%+of income on rent
35.6%±43
VT: 48.4%
63.3%±31.7Highest
VT: 48.4%
31.4%±20Lowest
VT: 48.4%
31.5%±17
VT: 48.4%
Reading and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Below poverty line
8.4%Highest
VT: 10.1%
8.4%Highest
VT: 10.1%
7.8%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
7.8%Lowest
VT: 10.1%
Housing
Homeownersof occupied homes
76.2%
VT: 73.2%
84.9%Highest
VT: 73.2%
51.6%Lowest
VT: 73.2%
57.8%
VT: 73.2%
Typical home builtmedian year
1977Highest
1 yr newer than VT
1969
7 yrs older than VT
1938Lowest
38 yrs older than VT
1945
31 yrs older than VT
Getting to work
Average commuteone way
19 minLowest
18% below VT
33 minHighest
41% above VT
22 min
6% below VT
23 min
3% below VT
Work from home
28.1%±24.1Highest
VT: 16.9%
22.9%±10.6
VT: 16.9%
6.6%±4.7Lowest
VT: 16.9%
10.3%±5
VT: 16.9%
Pittsfield and Reading are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher.
Schools
Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading — — #61 of 70 in VT #61 of 70 in VT
School district — Mountain Views Unified Union School District #76 — —
High school in town — None in town — —
On TownTapestry
Old photos in History None yet None yet None yet 12 photos →

VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.