Compare towns
Pittsfield vs Randolph vs Chittenden
Cost, people, housing, commute and schools, side by side, each benchmarked against Vermont.
What stands out worked out from the figures below
Pittsfield has the most people working from home (28.1%).
Randolph has grown the fastest since 2010 (-0.1%).
Chittenden has the highest household income ($106k).
What matters to you?
Pick a few. We’ll pull those rows to the top and mark which town comes out ahead on each. There’s no overall score: what matters is up to you.
| Measure | Pittsfield | Randolph | Chittenden |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your priorities | |||
| People | |||
| Population | 391Lowest |
4,843Highest |
1,318 |
| Growth since 20102010 → 2020 census | -7.7%Lowest VT: +2.8% |
-0.1%Highest VT: +2.8% |
-1.7% VT: +2.8% |
| Median age | 53.8±3.5Highest 25% above VT |
40.4±7.4Lowest 6% below VT |
50.8±6.3 18% above VT |
| Pittsfield and Chittenden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Kids under 18 | 13.6%±8.4Lowest VT: 17.9% |
17.3%±4.4Highest VT: 17.9% |
13.8%±2.5 VT: 17.9% |
| Randolph and Chittenden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Age 65+ | 30.4%±7.1Highest VT: 21.4% |
22.9%±4.2 VT: 21.4% |
21.8%±4Lowest VT: 21.4% |
| Pittsfield and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Bachelor’s degree+adults 25+ | 45.4% VT: 43.8% |
40.8%Lowest VT: 43.8% |
51.5%Highest VT: 43.8% |
| Enrolled in collegeshare of residents | 2.8%±3.5Lowest VT: 7% |
11.2%±2.5Highest VT: 7% |
3.8%±1.6 VT: 7% |
| Cost of living | |||
| Household incomemedian | $65,852±$12kLowest 19% below VT |
$76,758±$6k 5% below VT |
$106,250±$28kHighest 31% above VT |
| Chittenden and Randolph are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Home valuemedian, owner-occupied | $313,300±$73k about the VT average |
$278,700±$38kLowest 12% below VT |
$346,800±$35kHighest 10% above VT |
| Chittenden and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Rentmedian gross, monthly | $1,035±$140Lowest 16% below VT |
$1,172±$173Highest 5% below VT |
$1,125±$488 9% below VT |
| Randolph and Chittenden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Property taxmedian, yearly | $5,181 about the VT average |
$4,698Lowest 7% below VT |
$5,346Highest 6% above VT |
| Renters paying 30%+of income on rent | 35.6%±43 VT: 48.4% |
54.1%±17.8Highest VT: 48.4% |
14.8%±55.7Lowest VT: 48.4% |
| Randolph and Pittsfield are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Below poverty line | 8.4%Highest VT: 10.1% |
7.7% VT: 10.1% |
6.6%Lowest VT: 10.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Homeownersof occupied homes | 76.2% VT: 73.2% |
67.2%Lowest VT: 73.2% |
93.5%Highest VT: 73.2% |
| Typical home builtmedian year | 1977 1 yr newer than VT |
1971Lowest 5 yrs older than VT |
1980Highest 4 yrs newer than VT |
| Getting to work | |||
| Average commuteone way | 19 minLowest 18% below VT |
21 min 12% below VT |
28 minHighest 21% above VT |
| Work from home | 28.1%±24.1Highest VT: 16.9% |
12.9%±4.7Lowest VT: 16.9% |
15%±3.6 VT: 16.9% |
| Pittsfield and Chittenden are within the Census margin of error here, so we can’t say which is really higher. | |||
| Schools | |||
| Public school scoresrank in state, math + reading | — | #55 of 70 in VT | — |
| School district | — | Orange Southwest Unified Union School District #59 | Barstow Unified Union School District #49 |
| High school in town | — | Randolph Union High School | None in town |
| Students per teacherat that high school | — | 9.4 |
— |
| On TownTapestry | |||
| Old photos in History | None yet | None yet | None yet |
VT average · Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2020–2024; 2010 & 2020 decennial census; NCES Common Core of Data. “±” is the Census margin of error. Property tax is top-coded by the Census at $10,000+. School rank compares math and reading proficiency against the state average.